« Speed doesn’t kill | Main | Please, please let me win! »

June 20, 2005

2005 Formula 1 United States Grand Prix

http://www.doctorvee.co.uk [doctorvee] Well, that was ”¦ comical, embarassing, farcical, suicidal. There are any number of words you could use, but none of them refer to the racing because there wasn’t any.

Some slightly related from Technorati and Google.

Hnn.us[Hnn.us] Spencer Blog Archives 09-02: The left is clueless, suicidal, morally bankrupt, and ethically a contradiction, concerned only with power for the sake of power and, yes, in their lust for a phony "internationalism," deeply and profoundly unpatriotic. They hate the spirit of the Constitution, wish to pick and choose among those few parts of it they like, loathe America, are ashamed to be American (despite all their lies about "loving America, they don't really love this country - they love only their desperate, ugly wish for an America structured to the socialist, statist horror they truly desire), and would destroy the America of the Founders and the Constitution in a moment if they could wave a magic red wand and do so.

http://iamjessi.blogspot.com [Iamjessi.blogspot.com] Jessi's Journal: I had never thought a suicidal thought in my life, however, I got so depressed that I found myself wishing I could die. At that point, there was nothing in life worth living for.

http://blogs.ycon.net [Blogs.ycon.net] Akta - November 2004 :: PLSTW:Ycon.net: -The FDA finally admits antidepressant drugs cause suicidal tendencies in ... The animated short 'After You' is a comical play derived from that very line. ...

Geegaw.comhttp://www.geegaw.com [Geegaw.com] Geegaw (July 2000): Now I have to say that the story's not quite as tight as Pillow Book, and it's not as visually loaded as Drowning By Numbers. But it's philosophically brilliant!!!!

[Beggingtodiffer.com] Begging to Differ - March 2005 Archives: Despite his avowals that he wished to be proved wrong in the relative weights he assigned to genetic and social causes, his rhetorical assignment of burdens of proof belies his prejudice.  The evidence is far from sufficient to shift burdens of proof for or assign relative importance to any of the hypotheses Summers considered.  But this is not the fundamental issue, either.  Research scientists are entitled to their biases, in the sense that science can't get underway without people willing to place their bets on sometimes controversial hypotheses as yet unproved, and can't succeed unless people are free to vigorously pursue such hypotheses even in the face of rival hypotheses claiming their own empirical support.  The issue is rather that Summers was not speaking as a research scientist in the fields in question.  He was speaking as the President of Harvard University.  In that capacity, Summers' deployment of his biases could not function in the fruitful way biases often function among research scientists.Bitch Ph.D., whom Steve has treated to a few cheap shots in his post and in comments, contributed a fantastic observation about the social externalities that are lost on Summers' defenders:

Reflected tags on Technorati: Blog, ,

Posted at June 20, 2005 07:48 AM

Comments

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?